Calvin Ridley or Kendrick Bourne?
Who to start in Week 5, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 5 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 12 at 12:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Kendrick Bourne
- Rest of season: Kendrick Bourne — 3 of 6 experts
- Trade value: close to even
At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.
| Calvin Ridley | Kendrick Bourne | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 3 of 6 experts rank Calvin Ridley ahead · 3 rank Kendrick Bourne ahead | WR90#77–#107 | WR88#78–#100edge |
| Week 5 | WR93#86–#101 | WR50#38–#60edge |
| Week 5 projection (PPR) | 3.2 | 8.1edge |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #260 overall | 3 #257 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -54 ranks · -88 val | +75 ranks · +77 val |
| Rostered | 5% | 2% |
| Bye | 9 | 14 |
| Status | No injury designation | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 5, Calvin Ridley or Kendrick Bourne?
- Kendrick Bourne. This week's consensus has Calvin Ridley at WR93 (range #86–#101) and Kendrick Bourne at WR50 (range #38–#60). Projections: 3.2 vs 8.1 PPR points.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Calvin Ridley or Kendrick Bourne?
- Kendrick Bourne. Rest-of-season consensus: Calvin Ridley WR90 (range #77–#107) vs Kendrick Bourne WR88 (range #78–#100). 3 of 6 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Calvin Ridley ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Calvin Ridley for Kendrick Bourne?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Calvin Ridley is ranked #260 overall and Kendrick Bourne #257, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.