Brian Robinson Jr. or Mike Washington Jr.?

Who to start in Week 4, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 4 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 5 at 6:11 AM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: Brian Robinson Jr.
  • Rest of season: Mike Washington Jr. — 8 of 8 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

The weekly, season-long and trade-value calls differ. Choose the measure that fits your decision.

Brian Robinson Jr.Mike Washington Jr.
Rest of season
0 of 8 experts rank Brian Robinson Jr. ahead · 8 rank Mike Washington Jr. ahead
RB54#45–#58RB45#43–#50edge
Week 4RB48#40–#57edgeRB50#40–#59
Week 4 projection (PPR)5.34.9
Market Index value (redraft PPR)4 #226 overall5 #176 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)-53 ranks · -117 val-30 ranks · -100 val
Rostered36%40%
Bye1113
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 4, Brian Robinson Jr. or Mike Washington Jr.?
Brian Robinson Jr.. This week's consensus has Brian Robinson Jr. at RB48 (range #40–#57) and Mike Washington Jr. at RB50 (range #40–#59). Projections: 5.3 vs 4.9 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, Brian Robinson Jr. or Mike Washington Jr.?
Mike Washington Jr.. Rest-of-season consensus: Brian Robinson Jr. RB54 (range #45–#58) vs Mike Washington Jr. RB45 (range #43–#50). 8 of 8 FantasyPros experts who rank both have Mike Washington Jr. ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade Brian Robinson Jr. for Mike Washington Jr.?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Brian Robinson Jr. is ranked #226 overall and Mike Washington Jr. #176, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.