AJ Barner or Colby Parkinson?

Who to start in Week 7, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.

Week 7 · 2026 season · Consensus updated October 23 at 6:11 PM EDT

Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.

The lean

  • This week: AJ Barner
  • Rest of season: AJ Barner — 6 of 7 experts
  • Trade value: close to even

At least one measure is close to even. Your scoring, lineup and matchup can help separate them.

AJ BarnerColby Parkinson
Rest of season
6 of 7 experts rank AJ Barner ahead · 1 rank Colby Parkinson ahead
TE29#27–#30edgeTE32#24–#35
Week 7TE21#17–#27edgeTE22#17–#27
Week 7 projection (PPR)7.3edge6.5
Market Index value (redraft PPR)5 #168 overall4 #213 overall
Last 30 days (Market Index)+28 ranks · +74 val+72 ranks · +103 val
Rostered11%5%
Bye1111
StatusNo injury designationNo injury designation

Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs

Comparing a trade rather than a lineup choice? Check both sides of the offer with the AI Trade Analyzer, or review your Sleeper roster’s strengths and weaknesses.

Go deeper

More comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Who should I start in Week 7, AJ Barner or Colby Parkinson?
AJ Barner. This week's consensus has AJ Barner at TE21 (range #17–#27) and Colby Parkinson at TE22 (range #17–#27). Projections: 7.3 vs 6.5 PPR points.
Who is better for the rest of the season, AJ Barner or Colby Parkinson?
AJ Barner. Rest-of-season consensus: AJ Barner TE29 (range #27–#30) vs Colby Parkinson TE32 (range #24–#35). 6 of 7 FantasyPros experts who rank both have AJ Barner ahead for the rest of the season.
Should I trade AJ Barner for Colby Parkinson?
On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) AJ Barner is ranked #168 overall and Colby Parkinson #213, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.