Adam Randall or DJ Giddens?
Who to start in Week 3, who is better for the rest of the season, and who carries more trade value — from the FantasyPros expert consensus and the LeagueLogs Market Index.
Week 3 · 2026 season · Consensus updated September 22 at 6:11 AM EDT
Connect your league and an AI analyst settles debates like this one against your actual roster.
The lean
- This week: Weekly comparison unavailable
- Rest of season: DJ Giddens — 3 of 3 experts
- Trade value: close to even
Some comparison data is unavailable. Read each available measure separately and check player status before deciding.
| Adam Randall | DJ Giddens | |
|---|---|---|
| Rest of season 0 of 3 experts rank Adam Randall ahead · 3 rank DJ Giddens ahead | RB327#298–#355 | RB300#269–#337edge |
| Week 3 | — | — |
| Week 3 projection (PPR) | — | 1.4 |
| Market Index value (redraft PPR) | 3 #342 overall | 3 #312 overall |
| Last 30 days (Market Index) | -15 ranks · -11 val | -20 ranks · -19 val |
| Rostered | 1% | 1% |
| Bye | 13 | 13 |
| Status | OUT | No injury designation |
Expert consensus and ownership data via FantasyPros · Market Index values by LeagueLogs
Go deeper
More comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who should I start in Week 3, Adam Randall or DJ Giddens?
- Weekly consensus is not available for both Adam Randall and DJ Giddens on the same board. That is not a tie or a recommendation to sit either player. Check their player pages for current status and revisit when both are ranked.
- Who is better for the rest of the season, Adam Randall or DJ Giddens?
- DJ Giddens. Rest-of-season consensus: Adam Randall RB327 (range #298–#355) vs DJ Giddens RB300 (range #269–#337). 3 of 3 FantasyPros experts who rank both have DJ Giddens ahead for the rest of the season.
- Should I trade Adam Randall for DJ Giddens?
- On the LeagueLogs Market Index (redraft PPR) Adam Randall is ranked #342 overall and DJ Giddens #312, so a one-for-one is close to even. Run the exact deal through the free AI Trade Analyzer for a verdict on your league's scoring.